Arsenal denied clear penalty in Hull win, says former referee
Arsenal's 1-0 win over Hull City is dominating headlines not for the result alone, but for a controversial refereeing call that denied the Gunners a penalty.
Arsenal.com focused on the on-pitch story, reporting that Martin Odegaard scored the winning goal against Hull City (Arsenal.com). But much of the post-match conversation has centred on what happened at the other end of the pitch, with questions raised over a foul on Kai Havertz that went unpunished.
The BBC Sport cites former Premier League assistant referee Darren Cann, who explains why he believes Arsenal should have been awarded a penalty for the foul on Havertz during the win (BBC Sport). The Evening Standard agrees, reporting that Arsenal 'should have been awarded a penalty' and noting that Mikel Arteta has since received some clarity over the offside law that was at the heart of the decision (Evening Standard).
Both the BBC and the Evening Standard describe it as one of several controversial refereeing moments across the Premier League that weekend, with Arsenal's non-award a particular talking point given how it related to offside interpretation rather than a straightforward foul call.
For Arsenal fans, the takeaway is a familiar mix of relief and frustration: three points secured thanks to Odegaard's finish, but another case of a decision going against the Gunners that pundits and former officials believe should have gone their way. With Arteta reportedly seeking clarity from officials on the law itself, supporters will hope governing bodies take note ahead of similarly tight calls in future fixtures.
Written with the help of AI, using the headlines from the publishers credited above. Each point links to the original report — tap the source name to read it in full.
